ഇതിനു ശ്രദ്ധേയത പ്രശ്നം അല്ല, അവലംബപ്രശ്നം ആണുള്ളത്, അത് തന്നെയല്ലേ ഷിജൂ ശ്രദ്ധേയതയില്ലായ്മയിലേക്ക് നയിക്കുന്നത്, അവലംബമൊക്കെ ലേഖനത്തിലുണ്ട്, അവലംബം കൊടുത്തിരിക്കുന്ന സൈറ്റിലെ ഒരു പാരഗ്രാഫ് കാണുക.
Point of View:
We have a Biblical viewpoint on the world. Ooparts are evidence, we think, that the Flood actually happened. News items or magazine articles that report them may not have the same perspective that Christians do. When we read for instance, a scientific article that puzzles over our lack of genetic variability, we think of the Flood of Noah. We would include that article here, without editing, because we expect Christians to use their filters on such an article. That does not mean that we agree with the evolutionary timeframe given in said article.
We think itï¿½s more interesting when general newspaper articles or science articles observe data that they might see one way, but that Christians might see another way given our own knowledge about God, creation and the flood. Itï¿½s more interesting to quote Stephen Jay Gould saying that ï¿½the lack of transitional fossils is the trade secret of paleontologyï¿½, than it might be to hear another Christian say it.
So, no we donï¿½t believe the universe is millions or billions of years old. We donï¿½t know how old it isï¿½we just know who created it and how long it took Him. We do not believe in pre-Adamic races, though we do believe that there were ï¿½civiilizationsï¿½ prior to the Flood. We donï¿½t believe in space aliens or cooties. We expect you to use your own knowledge filter on this site. ദീപു [deepu] 11:42, 2 സെപ്റ്റംബർ 2011 (UTC)