ബി. എൻ. റാവു

**Sir**
ബി.എൻ. റാവു
Sir ബി.എൻ. റാവു
	1988 ലെ ഇന്ത്യൻ സ്റ്റാമ്പിൽ റാവു
ഐക്യരാഷ്ട്രസഭയിലെ ഇന്ത്യയുടെ സ്ഥിരം പ്രതിനിധി
	പദവിയിൽ; മാർച്ച് 1948 – 1952
മുൻഗാമി	സമർ സെൻ
പിൻഗാമി	രാജേശ്വർ ദയാൽ
അന്താരാഷ്ട്ര നീതിന്യായ കോടതിയിലെ ജഡ്ജി
	പദവിയിൽ; 1952–1954
മുൻഗാമി	ചാൾസ് ഡി വിഷർ
പിൻഗാമി	മുഹമ്മദ് സഫറുല്ല ഖാൻ
ഐക്യരാഷ്ട്രസഭ സുരക്ഷാ സമിതിയുടെ പ്രസിഡന്റ്
	പദവിയിൽ; ജൂൺ 1950 — ജൂലൈ 1950 ; മാർച്ച് 1951 — ഏപ്രിൽ 1951
വ്യക്തിഗത വിവരങ്ങൾ
ജനനം	26 ഫെബ്രുവരി 1887; മംഗലാപുരം, ബ്രിട്ടീഷ് രാജ് (ഇപ്പോൾ കർണാടക)
മരണം	30 നവംബർ 1953 (66 വയസ്സ്); സൂറിച്ച്, സ്വിറ്റ്സർലൻഡ്
ജോലി	Civil servant; Jurist; Judge of the International Court of Justice; Constitutional scholar;

ഒരു ഇന്ത്യൻ സിവിൽ സർവീസ് ഉദ്യോഗസ്ഥനും, നിയമജ്ഞനും, നയതന്ത്രജ്ഞനും, ഇന്ത്യൻ ഭരണഘടനാ അസംബ്ലിയുടെ ഭരണഘടനാ ഉപദേഷ്ടാവെന്ന നിലയിൽ അറിയപ്പെടുന്ന ഒരു രാഷ്ട്രതന്ത്രജ്ഞനുമായിരുന്നു സർ ബെനഗൽ നർസിംഗ് റാവു CIE (26 ഫെബ്രുവരി 1887-30 നവംബർ 1953) ^[1]^[2]^[3] 1950 മുതൽ 1952 വരെ ഐക്യരാഷ്ട്രസഭാ സുരക്ഷാ സമിതി യിലെ ഇന്ത്യയുടെ പ്രതിനിധിയുമായിരുന്നു അദ്ദേഹം.

അവലംബം

↑ Elangovan, Arvind (2019). Norms and Politics: Sir Benegal Narsing Rau in the Making of the Indian Constitution, 1935–1950. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 22–23. ISBN 978-0-19-949144-5. In his role as Constitutional Adviser, Rau's contributions consisted of not only advising the Constituent Assembly but also members of the Indian National Congress, and the All-India Muslim League. In the Constituent Assembly itself, Rau's influence was substantive. Significantly, Rau produced the draft constitution, which the drafting committee chaired by B. R. Ambedkar went on to deliberate. Subsequently, Rau was involved in evaluating the comments received on the draft constitution and incorporating them before it was submitted to the Constituent Assembly in late 1948.
↑ "Sir Benegal Narsing Rau Indian jurist". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Sir Benegal Narsing Rau (born February 26, 1887, Karkala or Mangalore, Mysore [now Karnataka], India—died November 30, 1953, Zürich, Switzerland) was one of the foremost Indian jurists of his time. He helped draft the constitutions of Burma (Myanmar) in 1947 and India in 1950
↑ Ewing, Cindy (2020). "Codifying Minority Rights: Postcolonial Constitutionalism in Burma, Ceylon, and India". In Moses, A. Dirk; Duranti, Marco; Burke, Roland (eds.). Decolonization, Self-Determination, and the rise of Global Human Rights Politics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 179–206. ISBN 978-1-108-47935-6. (p. 190) In order to protect both individual and group rights, India's constitutional adviser B. N. Rau prepared a key brief that changed how nights were expressed and enumerated in the constitution. His September 1946 note on fundamental rights expounded on justiciability and the need to identify which rights would be enforceable in court. Justiciability thus became a way to bridge the gap between committee members who wanted to write in as many rights as possible and those who wanted a more narrow set of rights. Rau laid out a scheme to divide fundamental rights into two categories: legally enforceable and not enforceable, pointing to the Irish constitution as a model for framing "a distinction between two broad classes of rights," referring to "certain rights which require positive action by the State and which can be guaranteed only so far as such action is practicable, while others merely require that the State shall abstain from prejudicial action." The fundamental rights subcommittee debated Rau's proposal in February 1947, with committee members K. M. Munshi and B. R. Ambedkar initially opposing splitting these rights. ... (p. 191) In March 1947, after the subcommittee concluded debate, the assembly agreed to the expanive bill of rights and divided fundamental rights into two sections based on Rau's original proposal. ... (pp. 192–193) In early April 1947, Rau completed the fundamental rights report. The constituent assembly convenced for its third session later that month and each subcommittee presented its findings over a series of raucous debates. Patel presented the new draft bill of rights, which was adopted by the assembly on August 28, 1947. Observing these sessions at Constitution House was Chan Htoon, the Burmese constitutional adviser. Aung San tasked Chan Htoon with studying the constitutions of different countries and developing relationships with members of the Indian legal academy. Having developed a friendship with Rau, Chan Htoon discussed the draft constitution with Rau in the setting of the constituent assembly. The cross-border consultations between India and Burma led to the intertwining of their constitutional ideas, best examplified by their provisions on individual rights and state duties.

[elangovan_bnrau-1] Elangovan, Arvind (2019). Norms and Politics: Sir Benegal Narsing Rau in the Making of the Indian Constitution, 1935–1950. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 22–23. ISBN 978-0-19-949144-5. In his role as Constitutional Adviser, Rau's contributions consisted of not only advising the Constituent Assembly but also members of the Indian National Congress, and the All-India Muslim League. In the Constituent Assembly itself, Rau's influence was substantive. Significantly, Rau produced the draft constitution, which the drafting committee chaired by B. R. Ambedkar went on to deliberate. Subsequently, Rau was involved in evaluating the comments received on the draft constitution and incorporating them before it was submitted to the Constituent Assembly in late 1948.

[britannica-bnrau-2] "Sir Benegal Narsing Rau Indian jurist". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Sir Benegal Narsing Rau (born February 26, 1887, Karkala or Mangalore, Mysore [now Karnataka], India—died November 30, 1953, Zürich, Switzerland) was one of the foremost Indian jurists of his time. He helped draft the constitutions of Burma (Myanmar) in 1947 and India in 1950

[cewing-rau-rights-2020-lead1-3] Ewing, Cindy (2020). "Codifying Minority Rights: Postcolonial Constitutionalism in Burma, Ceylon, and India". In Moses, A. Dirk; Duranti, Marco; Burke, Roland (eds.). Decolonization, Self-Determination, and the rise of Global Human Rights Politics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 179–206. ISBN 978-1-108-47935-6. (p. 190) In order to protect both individual and group rights, India's constitutional adviser B. N. Rau prepared a key brief that changed how nights were expressed and enumerated in the constitution. His September 1946 note on fundamental rights expounded on justiciability and the need to identify which rights would be enforceable in court. Justiciability thus became a way to bridge the gap between committee members who wanted to write in as many rights as possible and those who wanted a more narrow set of rights. Rau laid out a scheme to divide fundamental rights into two categories: legally enforceable and not enforceable, pointing to the Irish constitution as a model for framing "a distinction between two broad classes of rights," referring to "certain rights which require positive action by the State and which can be guaranteed only so far as such action is practicable, while others merely require that the State shall abstain from prejudicial action." The fundamental rights subcommittee debated Rau's proposal in February 1947, with committee members K. M. Munshi and B. R. Ambedkar initially opposing splitting these rights. ... (p. 191) In March 1947, after the subcommittee concluded debate, the assembly agreed to the expanive bill of rights and divided fundamental rights into two sections based on Rau's original proposal. ... (pp. 192–193) In early April 1947, Rau completed the fundamental rights report. The constituent assembly convenced for its third session later that month and each subcommittee presented its findings over a series of raucous debates. Patel presented the new draft bill of rights, which was adopted by the assembly on August 28, 1947. Observing these sessions at Constitution House was Chan Htoon, the Burmese constitutional adviser. Aung San tasked Chan Htoon with studying the constitutions of different countries and developing relationships with members of the Indian legal academy. Having developed a friendship with Rau, Chan Htoon discussed the draft constitution with Rau in the setting of the constituent assembly. The cross-border consultations between India and Burma led to the intertwining of their constitutional ideas, best examplified by their provisions on individual rights and state duties.

[1]

[2]

[3]