"വിക്കിപീഡിയ:പഞ്ചായത്ത് (പലവക)" എന്ന താളിന്റെ പതിപ്പുകൾ തമ്മിലുള്ള വ്യത്യാസം

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3,229 ബൈറ്റുകൾ കൂട്ടിച്ചേർത്തിരിക്കുന്നു ,  14 വർഷം മുമ്പ്
desysop jigesh
(ഇനിയും ഈ രീതി തുടരരുതെന്ന് ഒരിക്കല്‍ കൂടി അപേക്ഷിക്കുന്നു.)
(desysop jigesh)
 
::ഇതാണ്‌ ശരി, ഒന്നാമതെ ആളു കുറവ്, അതിന്റെ കൂടെ ബ്ലോക്ക് ചെയ്യലും കൂടി വേണോ. ഇതിന്റെ അര്‍ത്ഥം എന്തു വൃത്തികേടും കാട്ടമെന്നല്ല. ഇനി മുതല്‍ ഇക്കാര്യത്തില്‍ ഒരു അഭിപ്രായം പറയാനുള്ള ആള്‍ക്കാരുള്ളതിനാല്‍ അല്പം കൂടി കാക്കാമെന്നാണെന്റെ അഭിപ്രായം--[[User:Praveenp|പ്രവീണ്‍]]''':'''<font color="green" style="font-size: 70%">[[User talk:Praveenp|സംവാദം‍]]</font> 11:45, 23 ജൂലൈ 2007 (UTC)
==Desysop Jigesh==
I would suggest speedy desysopping of Jigesh because, he is absolutely ignorant of Wikipedia policies, he abuses his tools, and he is a disruptive editor.
1. Abusive block of the IP 212.107.116.248
The IP removed the photo gallery from Alappuzha article. The edit is not vandalism. The improportonate distribution of pics vis a vis text is unseemly. Jigesh also has not found vandalism in the edit. He didn't leave a comment on the IP talk page questioning the edits. The IP has seven contributions none of which is vandalism. Even if you construe the last edit as vandalism one month block is clear abuse of tools. If Jigesh really thought it was vandalism, a mere warning would have been more than enough. No vandalism from the IP, no warning from Jigesh, but a one month block slapped on the IP with hardly meaningful summary. [http://ml.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=പ്രത്യേകം:Log&type=block&page=ഉപയോക്താവ്:212.107.116.248 See]. I questioned his conduct here in a thread seen above here, but nobody took care of that. About an hour after the block, Jigesh unblocks the IP with the summary "Leaving my decision to beurocrat Sunil". Why he chose to unblock is not known. Again, he has notfied the IP about the unblock either! Was Jigesh testing his buttons or was he showing others that he was capable of blocking? In any case, this abuse is worst expectable from an admin.
 
2. Jigesh removing AFD template from an article
I put AFD template on an article സംഗീതം because the content of the article has an obnoxious religious slant. Among other thing the content presumes that the readers of the article are Hindus with an inclusive നാം (we). I had earlier notified the editor who made the objectionable additions about the nonencyclopedic nature of her contributions. I had also questioned the religious bias of her articles. The user showed no improvement and I put the AFD template on the article. Jigesh unilaterally chose to remove the AFD without discussion. No discussion, no enlightening edit summary, and above all no change in the content. This is disruption. On the other hand he tried to summarily deal with a contributor whom he seems to dislike because the editor doesn't conform to his pov. [[User:Sajetpa]] added two qutoes to [[ഇന്ത്യന്‍ ജമാ അത്തെ ഇസ്ലാമി]]. The validity of the quotes (apparently to eulogise the organisation) is moot . However, what Jigesh did was to remove the new addition with two already existing quotes. He didn't discuss his removal, didn't talk to Sajetpa. The existing quotes were very much in place in the article. In short, he is ready to tamper with an AFD to push his pov while he vandalises content on articles which are not to his liking.
A discussion should take place on the subject. It is the responsibility of the active users to participate in discussion. I would also like to remind all that head count is not what matters. Since the admins baulk at bold decisions, I will take it upon myself to remove any disruptive comments posted in this section. [[ഉപയോക്താവ്:Calicuter|Calicuter]] 05:23, 24 ജൂലൈ 2007 (UTC)
413

തിരുത്തലുകൾ

"https://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/പ്രത്യേകം:മൊബൈൽവ്യത്യാസം/72409" എന്ന താളിൽനിന്ന് ശേഖരിച്ചത്

ഗമന വഴികാട്ടി